MBAOdds

Application odds snapshot

Your target programs

Academic benchmarks link to official school profiles. Acceptance rates use 2025 U.S. News data via Poets&Quants.

Across your target list

Estimated chance of multiple acceptances

Based on the current estimates below
At least 1 program
45%
At least 2 programs
13%
At least 3 programsAll selected
2%

Combined odds account for the fact that the same application strengths can affect every school.

01

Chicago Booth

Tier 1 · Class of 2027

More favorable
33%estimated probability
Probability scale from 0 to 100%. 27.3% acceptance rate, plausible band 20–49%, with average rest-of-application estimate 33%.
0%20–49% plausible band100%
3.60+0.10 vs. class
670At/above benchmark
Relative strengthStrongerthan the average applicant
Official class profile
02

The Wharton School

Tier 1 · Class of 2027

Competitive reach
18%estimated probability
Probability scale from 0 to 100%. 18.6% acceptance rate, plausible band 10–31%, with average rest-of-application estimate 18%.
0%10–31% plausible band100%
3.70+0.00 vs. class
676Below benchmark
Relative strengthSimilar tothe average applicant
Official class profile
03

Harvard Business School

Tier 1 · Class of 2027

High reach
9%estimated probability
Probability scale from 0 to 100%. 11.2% acceptance rate, plausible band 5–16%, with average rest-of-application estimate 9%.
0%5–16% plausible band100%
3.76-0.06 vs. class
685Below benchmark
Relative strengthSimilar tothe average applicant
Official class profile

The marker shows the estimate for your selected rest-of-application strength.

Resources

Coaching and test preparation.

Referral disclosure: MBA Odds is run by Matt Roy, the Achievable GRE course author and a GRE tutor on Leland. Matt may earn a commission or referral reward from purchases made through these links.

MBA application coaching

Browse MBA admissions coaches on Leland and compare their profiles, services and rates.

GRE tutoring

Browse GRE tutors on Leland and compare their profiles, services and rates.

GMAT tutoring

Browse GMAT tutors on Leland and compare their profiles, services and rates.

Achievable GRE course

Get 15% off Achievable's GRE prep course, including its online textbook, practice questions and full-length practice exams.

Methodology

What the number means—and what it does not.

How the estimate is calculated

Let U be your single undergraduate score (defined below) and Gₛ the program GPA benchmark. For the test equations, M is GMAT and V and Q are GRE verbal and quantitative scores; the subscript s marks the school benchmark.

Undergraduate signalu = (U − Gₛ) / 0.28
GMAT signalt = (M − Mₛ) / 42
GRE signalt = [0.45(V − Vₛ) + 0.55(Q − Qₛ)] / 4.5
Academic liftΔ = 0.52u + 0.64t
Bounded upsideΔ* = ln(4)tanh[Δ / ln(4)] if Δ > 0; otherwise Δ* = Δ
Academic estimatep = σ[logit(p₀) + Δ*], where σ(x) = 1 / (1 + e⁻ˣ)
Displayed estimatepᵣ = σ[logit(p) + r ln(2)], where −1 ≤ r ≤ 1

Here p₀ is the program’s acceptance-rate baseline and logit(p)=ln[p/(1−p)]. The optional rest-of-application slider sets r: Average is 0, the weakest endpoint is −1 and the strongest endpoint is +1. This moves the displayed probability continuously within the plausible band. The positive academic adjustment approaches ln(4), so academics can multiply baseline admission odds by at most four; negative academic adjustments are not artificially bounded.

How the undergraduate score works

Your GPA is the starting point. Quantitative-course GPA is compared with a fixed 3.0 reference: above 3.0 adds a small lift, 3.0 is neutral, and below 3.0 subtracts a small amount. Course count controls the weight, reaching its maximum at eight graded courses. The same reference applies to everyone, regardless of overall GPA. Zero courses is neutral.

Coursework weightw = 0.15 × min(n / 8, 1)
Coursework adjustmentc = 0 if n = 0; otherwise clamp(w × (Gq − 3.0), −0.15, 0.15)
Class-standing adjustmentrₚ = 0 if omitted; otherwise 0.10 × clamp((P − 75) / 25, −1, 1)
Undergraduate scoreU = clamp(G + clamp(c + rₚ, −0.20, 0.20), 0, 4)

G is overall GPA, Gq is quantitative-course GPA, n is the graded course count, and P is official class percentile (90 means top 10%). With zero courses, the coursework adjustment is zero and quantitative GPA is not needed. clamp limits a value to the stated range. Coursework can add or subtract at most 0.15, and class standing at most 0.10; all adjustments together are limited to ±0.20. The score stays on a 0–4 scale. Leaving class percentile blank is neutral.

The 3.0 reference, coursework weight, eight-course threshold, 75th-percentile reference and adjustment limits are provisional modeling assumptions, not measured admissions effects. The 3.0 reference is not a school admissions cutoff. Quantitative grades overlap with overall GPA, so their effect stays small within a single undergraduate score. For example, five courses at a 3.5 quantitative GPA add 0.046875 before the score limits are applied. Schools do not publish comparable undergraduate-score benchmarks; the model uses their reported GPA as a reference. School cards still compare your actual GPA with the reported class GPA.

Why above median does not mean likely admission

The median is calculated among enrolled students, not all applicants. It tells us nothing about how many rejected candidates also had above-median numbers. At a highly selective school, academic strength is common in the applicant pool, so it can improve your position without making admission more likely than rejection.

Why the range is wide

MBA admissions are holistic and schools publish enrolled-student summaries—not applicant-level acceptance data. If p is the academic estimate, the band halves or doubles its admission odds. The slider chooses a point within that band:

Weaker applicationp_low = σ[logit(p) − ln(2)]
Stronger applicationp_high = σ[logit(p) + ln(2)]

This is an odds-based scenario range, not a statistical confidence interval, prediction interval or guarantee.

How multiple-acceptance odds are calculated

The displayed school estimates are marginal probabilities. The slider conditions every estimate on the same self-rated application strength, but it does not make decisions fully independent. A broad, subjective rating cannot capture every shared factor, school-to-school signal or source of model uncertainty. The combined figures therefore retain a provisional positive-correlation adjustment.

Conditional school chanceqᵢ(z) = Φ{[Φ⁻¹(pᵢ) + √0.30 z] / √0.70}
At least m offersP(N ≥ m) = ∫ φ(z) P(N ≥ m | Z = z) dz

Z represents residual shared influences after the visible inputs; φ and Φ are the standard normal density and cumulative distribution. Conditional on a fixed Z=z, school decisions are treated as independent and the usual Poisson-binomial calculation is used. Integrating over Z makes the final outcomes positively related while preserving every school’s slider-adjusted probability. The 30% latent-correlation setting is provisional—not estimated from applicant-level admissions data. If all remaining shared influences were known and fixed, setting it to zero would recover the independent calculation; for example, P(at least one)=1−∏ᵢ(1−pᵢ).

Data sources and freshness

Academic benchmarks link directly to the latest available official school profiles, primarily Class of 2027. Each card labels a figure as a median, average or benchmark according to how the school reports it; a benchmark indicates that a directly comparable median was not published. Acceptance-rate baselines use 2025 U.S. News data published in Poets&Quants’ 2026 acceptance-rate table. Hover or select a sourced label to see its provenance, then use the “Open the source” button to visit the underlying page.